IES ShapeBuilder User's Guide
Release History

Version 11.0 Features

General

Modeling

Analysis

Documentation


Version 10.0 Features

Engineering Benefits

Usability Benefits

Removed Features


Version 9.0 Features

Section Properties

Functions/Operations

User Interface/Usability

Quality Control/Performance

Architecture


Version 8.0 Features

Introduction

ShapeBuilder 8.0 offers an incremental improvement over version 7.0 with the following improvements to streamline your work flow

Major Features

Minor


Version 7.0 Features

Introduction

ShapeBuilder 7.0 represents a complete rewrite of the software from the inside out. User's of previous versions should brace themselves for some fundamental (and excellent) changes. We hope you enjoy the fruit of our labor. The new system is built on the latest technologies such as multi-threaded operations to leverage the power of the processor in your machine. We have streamlined the steps required to work with shapes. We have removed requirements to destructively modify shapes before certain operations. We have streamlined and overhauled the user-interface to reflect actual usage of the product. The new system uses the concept of a "Flattener" which looks at overlapping parts of the same material and flattens them into a single boundary. Any hole shapes are then subtracted from this. It is important for you to use the "F" key in the Sketch View or the Filter option to show the flattened shape and verify it is what you expect it to be.

Engineering Improvements

Editing Improvements

General and Performance

Features Removed or Changed Significantly

Advanced torsional analysis of "separated" shapes or composite materials

We have removed the ability to calculate J for "disconnected" shapes or composite-material shapes. The reason we removed it, is because the entire calculation is based on the Warping Normal function and in the past we were making some very loose assumptions that we are no longer comfortable with making. How do two "independent" shapes behave in torsion? Does super-position apply? We don't have any good theoretical or test-data answers to this question, certainly not in the general sense for all shapes. You could analyze each part independently and use superposition if you think it is appropriate. You could provide some kind of connector parts to indicate how these shapes will be tied together during the torsional loading. Or you could help us track down some kind of published information on how to solve this problem!

Features Changed:

Features Removed:

Defects Corrected


Version 6.0 Features

Editing Improvements

Analysis Improvements

Other Improvements

Features Removed or Modified in 6.0


Version 5.0 Features


Version 4.5 Features


Version 4.0 Features


Version 3.0 Features

ShapeBuilder 3.0 is built on a whole new series of technology that will be appearing in future IES products. Some of the highlights of the new version include: